Marjorie Béchard

Marjorie Béchard has been part of the professional order of the chamber of Notaries of Quebec in 2007, after receiving a bachelor in laws from the University of Quebec in Montreal and her notarial diploma at the University of Montreal.

Me Béchard worked as an employed notary for some time and rapidly formed her own notarial study in 2009. Me Béchard practiced for 7 years in traditional practice where she developed a personalised approach with her business clientele. In parallel, she started specialising in the co-ownership field with special formation and by implicating herself as a notary in real estate projects as an instrumenting solicitor. She developed a specific interest in this field.

Since 2015, Me Béchard joined the law firm De Grandpré Joli-Coeur, in the team of co-ownership.

Rights of withdrawal and of preemption, concepts you should understand

In co-ownership, the rights of withdrawal and of preemption may disrupt the course of a real estate transaction. In my practice, I had to intervene a number of times before proceeding with a sale, often to the astonishment (and sometimes displeasure!) of the parties, to safeguard their rights.

 

 

 

Right of withdrawal

Article 1022 of the Civil Code of Québec grants a right of withdrawal to co-owners in an undivided co-ownership. Under this article, an undivided co-owner may redeem the undivided share of an immovable another undivided co-owner has sold to a third party (an outsider to the indivision). In such cases, the undivided co-owners have sixty (60) days from their knowledge of the transaction (usually a sale) to proceed to the redemption of such share by reimbursing to the third party acquirer the acquisition price and the associated transaction costs (real estate broker, notary, etc.). However, this right has a time limit, i.e. it can only be exercised within one year from the date of the transaction. Be aware that the buyer cannot oppose it, which can of course have disastrous consequences! Imagine buying an undivided condo and finding yourself on the street a few months later. However do not panic, as in practice, this is a rare occurrence, as notaries have the duty, in the transaction, to carry out the necessary appropriate verifications.

Right of Preemption

When an indivision agreement is published on an immovable, it will most likely include a clause of waiver to the right of withdrawal and provide that this right is replaced by a right of preemption (also known as “Right of first refusal”). This right requires an undivided co-owner who wishes to sell his share to first offer it to the other undivided co-owners, save in exceptional cases (such as when an undivided co-owner sells his share or a portion thereof to his spouse ).

In any event, when subject to a right of preemption, an undivided co-owner must send to the other co-owners a notice indicating the price and conditions under which he proposes to sell his share, said price and conditions must be the same as those offered or that would have been offered by a bona fide purchaser. Thereafter, the other co-owners have a time limit (which may vary according to the wording of the clause) to take a decision. If all the undivided co-owners waive their right of preemption or if the deed of sale is not signed within the prescribed period, the undivided co-owner who wishes to sell his share can then do so, but for a price and conditions at least equal to those offered to other undivided co-owners.

It is important to note that the law provides that the right of withdrawal and of preemption cannot coexist. Indeed, the presence of a right of preemption automatically entails a tacit renunciation of the right of withdrawal. Some indivision agreements may also contain a right to purchase upon the death of an undivided co-owner. In the presence of such a clause, a professional should be consulted in order to understand the rights and obligations arising therefrom.

What about divided co-ownership into all of this?

Insofar as divided co-ownership is concerned, nothing in the Civil Code of Québec creates a right of withdrawal in favor of co-owners; this may be perceived as an advantage. Some declarations of co-ownership include a clause creating a right of preemption, despite article 1056 of the Civil Code of Québec enacting that the declaration of co-ownership may not impose any restriction on the rights of the co-owners except those that are justified by the destination of the immovable, its characteristics and its location. Yet, among the rights of a co-owner, there is the right to dispose of his property freely. Consequently, a clause in the declaration of co-ownership granting a right of preemption may contravene this provision and be invalidated by a court.

Notwithstanding the above, it is not uncommon to find such a clause in small co-ownerships, in which case it could be justified by the destination of such an immovable, where, without limitation, co-owners' co-operation is essential to the proper operation of the syndicate and where the goal of preserving a convivial atmosphere could thus justify in certain respects restrictions on the right to freely dispose of a fraction, such as a right of preemption.

What to do when one wants to sell?

I recommend to my clients who wish to sell their undivided co-ownership unit (or divided co-ownership unit in a small co-ownership) to verify at once the presence of clauses relating to the right of withdrawal and of preemption.

In most cases, indivision agreements include a waiver of the right of withdrawal. If not, it is recommended to have the other co-owners sign a waiver of this right and, after consulting a notary, even go so far as to amend the indivision agreement itself.

As for the right of preemption, the clause should be read carefully, with the help of a professional, as needed, in order to fully understand it and to send the required documents to the other undivided co-owners. They shall acknowledge receipt and documentary evidence should be obtained in the event they have decided not to avail themselves of their right to acquire.

If the notary, during his title examination, notices such a clause, he does not have to give an opinion upon its appropriateness in the circumstances, but must raise its existence and explain its consequences, since non- compliance with the clause may result in a claim for damages from injured parties. In the ever-increasing pace of transactions, it becomes important for the vendor to verify everything at once, in order to avoid that the notary, at the end of the process, needs to communicate directly with all the undivided co-owners in order to obtain and cause to be signed any document required which may entail additional delays to closing the transaction.